Is it research misconduct if a researcher creates an idea?
If a researcher creates the idea for a project and is not listed in the preferred author order position on resulting publications, is this considered to be research misconduct under federal policy? No; instead it is a type of authorship dispute.
Which type of research misconduct is most likely to involve falsification?
Which type of research misconduct most likely occurred if someone intentionally removes data points from the data set in order to generate a deceptive conclusion? This situation most likely involves falsification. Falsification includes deceptively changing or omitting data.
What is the most effective strategy for preventing research misconduct?
Among the options mentioned, good mentoring is the most effective strategy for preventing research misconduct. Which of the following is true regarding the U.S. Federal Research Misconduct Policy?
Who makes the initial response to an allegation of research misconduct?
Federal funding agencies typically rely on an institution to make the initial response to an allegation of research misconduct. According to the U.S. Federal Research Misconduct Policy, fabrication involves:
What is common research misconduct?
In accordance with U.S. federal policy, there are three forms of research misconduct: plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification.
Is the most common form of scientific misconduct?
Plagiarism is, perhaps, the most common form of research misconduct. Researchers must be aware to cite all sources and take careful notes. Using or representing the work of others as your own work constitutes plagiarism, even if committed unintentionally.
Which type of inappropriate practice most likely occurred if a researcher takes credit for someone else's idea and does not acknowledge the original source quizlet?
Which type of inappropriate practice most likely occurred if a researcher takes credit for someone else's idea and does not acknowledge the original source? Comment : This situation most likely involves plagiarism.
Why does misconduct occur in research?
A range of possible reasons were posited: (1) career and funding pressures, (2) institutional failures of oversight, (3) commercial conflicts of interest, (4) inadequate training, (5) erosion of standards of mentoring, and (6) part of a larger pattern of social deviance.
What kind of ethical misconduct is more prevalent *?
The most common types of ethical misconduct were conflicts of interest, lying to employees and abusive behavior. In short, a culture where misconduct is tolerated—or, worse, encouraged—could result in higher turnover, lower productivity and, ultimately, a diminished reputation and profitability.
Which of the following is an example of research misconduct?
Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (a) Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
Which of the following is the most effective strategy for preventing research misconduct quizlet?
Among the options mentioned, good mentoring is the most effective strategy for preventing research misconduct.
Which of the following is most likely to be considered a conflict of commitment?
Which statement most accurately describes a conflict of commitment? It occurs when outside activities interfere with one's responsibilities to an employer.
Which of the following describes the most appropriate course of action that researchers should take as they prepare to leave their current institution for a new position?
Which of the following describes the most appropriate course of action that researchers should take as they prepare to leave their current institution for a new position? Researchers should review their current institution's policies regarding data ownership.
What are the types of misconduct?
The main types of misconduct are: offensive behavior, damage and theft, unsafe behavior and general policy infractions.
What are the causes of misconduct?
Examples might include: Financial or performance incentives. Pressure from management or a peer....How It WorksLack of sensitivity. ... Lack of awareness. ... Legitimate rationalization. ... Rationalization based on company loyalty.
How do you identify research misconduct?
Minimally, for something to count as research misconduct it must be committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly, and there must be a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community. Other abuses of the research process do not fall under the definition of research misconduct.
What does "not contributing to the publication" mean?
Listing someone as an author who did not actually contribute to the publication. Selectively presenting data that support the key findings of a paper. Presenting someone else's ideas or words and claiming them as one's own. Failing to report all of a study's conditions.
When should data analysis methods be specified?
Data analysis methods are generally uniform across disciplines. Data analysis methods can typically be specified at the close of a study after it is clear what kind of data has been collected. Data analysis methods should usually be specified in advance before a study begins.
Why is data selection important?
A data selection strategy is required by federal law. A good data selection strategy can eliminate the need for data collection. A data selection strategy must be established after the data are collected. Establishing a data selection strategy prior to collecting data decreases the chance of a biased outcome.
What is clear specification of the methods and procedures used?
Clear specification of the methods and procedures used is essential. Clear specification of the methods and procedures used is essential. Details of study design and execution, including data selected or excluded, is typically a core requirement.
Who is normally listed in the acknowledgments section?
Individuals who do not meet the criteria for authorship but who have made a noteworthy contribution are normally listed in the acknowledgments section. Individuals who do not meet the criteria for authorship but who have made a noteworthy contribution are normally listed in the acknowledgments section.
Can the government delay reporting research results?
A delay in reporting research results is not allowed by the U .S. government. Details of study design and execution should be omitted from publications unless requested. Details of data selection procedures should be omitted from publications unless requested.
Is authorship a conflict of interest?
No; instead it is a type of authorship dispute. Yes because it involves a form of fabrication. No; instead it is a type of financial conflict of interest. Yes because it involves a form of falsification. No; instead it is a type of authorship dispute.
What is falsification in research?
Falsification involves purposefully manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
What is the process of making up data or results?
Fabrication involves making up data or results, recording the data in a permanent record, sharing fake data informally or in a written report. According to the U.S. Federal Research Misconduct Policy, falsification involves:
What is an IRB?
An organizational IRB or Privacy Board, privacy official ("Privacy Officer"), or security official ("Security Officer"), depending on the issue. HIPAA's protections for health information used for research purposes... Supplement those of the Common Rule and FDA. Under HIPAA, a "disclosure accounting" is required:
What is considered a high risk of harm in NBAC?
In considering NBAC's analytic approach, an otherwise competent person who is acutely ill might be considered at especially high risk of harm for: Situational cognitive vulnerability. According to the authors, there are four common abuses that historically are described as giving rise to vulnerability.
What was the National Research Act of 1974?
The National Research Act of 1974 established the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The identification of guidelines, ethical principles and regulations came as a result of the deliberations of the National Commission.
What are the two criteria used by the National Science Foundation to evaluate a grant proposal?
The two main criteria that the National Science Foundation (NSF) uses to evaluate grant proposals are: The two main criteria used by NSF to evaluate a grant proposal are the intellectual merit and broader impacts of the proposal .
Is research eligible for exemption?
According to the federal regulations, research is eligible for exemption, if: Research is only eligible for exemption if all the activities associated with the research fall into one of eight categories of activities described in the federal regulations .
