what is precise monitoring of frequent student response

What is precise monitoring of frequent student response? Precise monitoring involves watching and listening to student responses. Every response is a potential source of assessment.

Full Answer

Where can I find more information about student progress monitoring?

Mar 14, 2020 · What is precise monitoring of frequent student response? Precise monitoring involves watching and listening to student responses. Every response is a potential source of …

How effective is student monitoring?

To achieve goals 1, 3 and 5, the staff believed that careful monitoring of student achievement and consistent and public recognition of their accomplishments would be required. Improvement …

Do teachers need training in classroom monitoring?

Dec 01, 2017 · It encourages student-led monitoring. Here is how Student Evidence Tracker helps accomplish each of the 5 monitoring techniques: Entrance and Exit Tickets: Students can …

What is progress monitoring in special education?

By: Kathleen McLane. Progress monitoring can give you and your child's teacher information that can help your child learn more and learn faster, and help you make better decisions about the …

What is precise monitoring and immediate feedback?

What does it mean to monitor student learning?

How do you monitor student progress?

In what ways do you monitor student participation and performance?

Why is it important to monitor students progress?

What is monitoring and types of monitoring?

What are examples of progress monitoring?

How often should we progress monitor students?

What is progress monitoring assessment?

What is the purpose of monitoring and evaluation at school level?

What is the purpose of monitoring in the school context?

What elements of progress monitoring do you think are most important to making good educational decisions and why?

What is student progress monitoring?

Student progress monitoring helps teachers evaluate how effective their instruction is, either for individual students or for the entire class. You are probably already familiar with the goals and objectives that must be included in the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for each child who receives special education services. ...

How does progress monitoring work?

A teacher who uses progress monitoring works with the goals in the IEP, and the state standards for the child's grade level, to develop goals that can be measured and tracked, and that can be used to divide what the child is expected to learn by the end of the year into shorter, measurable steps. For example, the child may have a reading goal that is stated in terms of the number of words per minute expected by the end of the year. Or, the child may have a math goal that is stated as the number of problems scored correctly on tests covering the math content for the year. Once the teacher sets the goals and begins instruction, then he or she measures the child's progress toward meeting the goals each week. All the tests have the same level of difficulty, so the weekly tests can reflect the child's rate of progress accurately. With each test, the teacher compares how much the child is expected to have learned to the child's actual rate of learning.

Why are weekly tests important?

All the tests have the same level of difficulty, so the weekly tests can reflect the child's rate of progress accurately. With each test, the teacher compares how much the child is expected to have learned to the child's actual rate of learning.

What happens after each weekly measurement?

After each weekly measurement, the teacher notes your child's performance level and compares it to previous measurements and to expected rates of learning. The teacher tracks the measurements on a graph as a way of showing the success of both the teacher and the student.

What is standardized test?

Standardized tests compare your child's performance with other children's or with state standards. However, these tests are given at the end of the year; the teacher who has been working with your child during the year will not be able to use the test results to decide how to help your child learn better. Progress monitoring can give you and your ...

How long does it take to measure a child's progress?

The measurements take from 1 to 5 minutes, so the child should not have the feeling of constantly being tested.

What happens if a child's performance does not meet the expectation?

If the child's performance on the measurement does not meet the expectation, then the teacher changes the teaching. The teacher might change the method being used, the amount of instructional time, the grouping arrangement (for example, individual instruction versus small-group instruction), or some other aspect of teaching. ...

What is a student response system?

Student response systems (SRSs) are commercially available technologies that promote student engagement during small- or whole-class lessons . An SRS consists of a radio receiver for the teacher, a group of key pads or “clickers” for the students, and software installed on a computer that allows the teacher to incorporate the SRS into existing software applications (Stav, Nielsen, Hansen-Nygard, & Thorseth, 2010). An SRS enables students to simultaneously respond by selecting or typing their answers to teacher-posed questions on their clickers. For example, a teacher can present a lecture, accompanied by a computer slide presentation, and imbed SRS questions about the lecture into the presentation. As students simultaneously answer the teacher’s questions with their devices, the teacher instantly receives data on students’ responses, which can be used to provide immediate feedback to the students or to evaluate their instructional performances (e.g., accuracy, participa- tion) following the lesson. Although SRSs are a promising instructional technology, currently their efficacy in enhancing K–12 students’ participation and learning is less well researched than low-tech strategies (such as response cards) that also permit simultaneous student responding. The same instructional considerations that apply to low-tech strategies also apply to high-tech systems like SRSs. Specifically, the teacher should build in as many practice opportunities as possible, teach briskly, use clear response signals, and provide immediate feedback. Smartphones and tablet computers have become ubiquitous and have myriad educational applications with the potential to enhance student engagement. Many

How effective are response cards?

Response cards not only enable higher rates of student responding, the simultaneous response format provides ongoing, forma- tive feedback to the teacher about each student’s performance, which can be used to evaluate students’ understanding of curricular content and to adapt instruction accordingly. Research has shown that response cards are effective in increasing students’ active responding and positively impacts learning . Gardner, Heward, and Grossi (1994) found that the use of response cards during science instruction in a fifth- grade inner-city classroom resulted in 14 times higher active responding with response cards than with hand raising. Additionally, all 22 students scored higher on next-day quizzes and a review test that followed instruction with response cards than on assessments that covered facts and concepts taught with the hand-raising procedure. Positive outcomes have been seen across all grade levels and subject matter, including a meta-analysis showing statistically significant positive effect sizes for test scores, achievement, and participation (see Randolph, 2007), as well as a reduction in disruptive behavior (Randolph, 2007; Schnorr, Freeman-Green, & Test, 2015). There appear to be many factors contributing to these outcomes. Response cards support the simultaneous responding of all students. When all students participate,

How does peer tutoring help with ASR?

Peer tutoring promotes high ASR by capitalizing on an existing classroom resource: the students. The essential features of peer tutoring include repeated opportunities for practice, regular and immediate feedback, systematic correction of errors, and data-based decision making (Bowman-Perrott et al., 2013; Greenwood, Carta, & Hall, 1988). With planning, peer tutoring can reduce teachers’ work and serves as a valuable classroom management tool, productively engaging students in teaching each other. Peer tutoring is one of the most researched high-ASR strategies, with more than 40 years of studies demonstrating its effectiveness across a variety of academic content areas and age levels (Leung, 2015) and for students with and without disabilities (Bowman-Perrott et al., 2013). Although there are many variations of peer tutoring (e.g., Robbins, 2011), class- wide peer tutoring (CWPT) is a well-established approach (Kamps, Barbetta, Leonard, & Delquadri, 1994). The following steps are typical in CWPT programs (see Bowman- Perrott, 2009). First, the teacher reviews and practices the CWPT procedures with the students. Then, the teacher pairs students into dyads for tutoring sessions. Tutoring sessions can occur daily or two or three times per week, and dyads can pair higher achieving with lower achieving students. Each student is given a folder of materials, including items such as cards for students to quiz each other and point sheets to track progress. To practice vocabulary, cards can contain words on one side and definitions on the other; to practice math, cards can contain math questions on one side and answers on the other. Students take turns quizzing one another, provid- ing positive feedback and error correction to their partners as appropriate. Correct responses are recorded in the folder and items or problems which the student has mastered are recorded as new items are introduced. In a variation of peer tutoring that enabled kindergarten students to teach one another basic reading skills, Van Norman and Wood (2008) examined a peer-tutoring program using a small, inexpensive recording device called the Mini-Me2, with six low-performing kindergarten students in an urban elementary school. Students were taught to quiz each other on reading vocabulary using cards with words printed on one side and the Mini-Me attached to the other. When pressed, the Mini-Me played

Why are guided notes important?

Regrettably, many students, particularly those with learning and other disabili- ties, are poor note takers (Boyle & Forchelli, 2014). Guided notes offer one way to improve the quality of students’ note taking while increasing their ASR and enhanc- ing their academic performance. According to Heward (1994), guided notes are “teacher-prepared handouts that guide a student through a lecture with standard cues and prepared space in which to write the key facts, concepts, and/or relationships” (p. 304). Guided notes are a high-ASR strategy because they create planned opportunities for student response during lectures. Like response cards, guided notes can be used with a wide range of academic subjects. To demonstrate this strategy’s utility, Haydon, Mancil, Kroeger, McLeskey, and Lin (2011) reviewed 13 studies that compared guided notes with tra- ditional note taking for students across a variety of K–12 and college settings. They found that guided notes improved students’ scores on quizzes and tests, increased the accuracy of their notes, and increased student responses during lectures, and that students preferred guided notes in comparison to traditional note taking. Guided notes are created using the following steps (see also Konrad, Joseph, & Itoi, 2011; Tincani, 2011), as exemplified in Figure 4. First, the teacher makes an outline of the lecture using a slide preparation/presentation program. The outline should contain consistent typographical cues, such as bullets, to draw students’ attention to salient points in the lecture; special cues (e.g., stars, bells) can be used

How does active student engagement affect academic achievement?

Increased engagement includes demonstrating more appropriate and on-task behaviors, and typically results in a greater number of correct responses (Simon- sen, Fairbanks, Briesch, Myers & Sugai, 2008). When these positive student behav- iors increase, it is less likely that students will have time to engage in inappropriate behaviors (Armendariz & Umbreit, 1999; Simonsen, Myers, & DeLuca, 2010). Researchers have examined ways for increasing active student response through a variety of high-ASR strategies (Tincani, 2011). These strategies have been shown to demonstrate consistently high rates of ASR during small- or whole-group instruction and for diverse students, including those with disabilities and other special learning needs. Collectively, the research findings underscore four important principles for enhancing student engagement.

What are the four strategies for prompting high ASR?

The four techniques are (a) response cards, (b) choral responding, (c) guided notes, and (d) peer tutor- ing. Each of the strategies is beneficial in increasing students’ active responding, increasing their rates of correct response and response accuracy, and, in some cases, decreasing their challenging behavior.

Why is feedback important in ASR?

For example, with response cards, choral responding, and peer tutoring lessons, students receive positive or correc- tive feedback for each response they make. Frequent feedback—whether delivered verbally or in writing—is critical because it improves accuracy of students’ responses, encourages participation, and discourages off -task and disruptive behaviors. When- ever possible, positive feedback—praise—should be behavior specific; that is, it should describe in specific terms the commended behavior (Tincani, 2011): “Nice job figuring out the answer to that problem.” Behavior-specific praise is an integral part of formative evaluation to assess students’ ongoing responsiveness to instruction.

What is progress monitoring in special education?

Progress monitoring was linked to special education and, eventually, to a system called “Response to Intervention,” or RTI. Teachers use assessments in the early grades to identify students at risk for reading problems and provide them with an “intervention.” Students are divided into three tiers: Tier 1 gets the regular curriculum; Tier 2 gets lessons focused on their particular needs, in small groups, plus more monitoring; and Tier 3, composed of those who haven’t responded to Tier 2, gets a more intensive intervention.

How often should a school give a progress monitoring test?

There are now several widely used, standardized progress-monitoring assessments that are supposed to be given three times a year, although schools may give them more often. And recent reports have used data from three such tests to estimate the pandemic’s impact on student achievement.

How to address comprehension problem?

The best way to address a comprehension problem is to immerse children in a coherent curriculum that builds knowledge of history, geography, science, and the arts along with literature. Unfortunately, though, most students spend many hours practicing supposed comprehension skills on a random variety of texts, with little focus on the content.

What is the name of the test that focuses on early literacy?

One, called DIBELS , focuses primarily on early literacy or “decoding” skills: things like naming letters of the alphabet, and phonics. If that test shows students need more intensive instruction on those kinds of skills, as many children in the early grades undoubtedly will, they should definitely get it—and it should be delivered by a teacher who has gotten the necessary training.

When do people think of standardized tests?

When people hear “standardized tests,” they generally think of state-mandated assessments given in the spring. Those scores may have huge ramifications for schools and teachers, but they typically don’t have any direct consequences for individual students.

When did progress monitoring start?

The origins of progress monitoring go back to the 1980s and an approach called “ curriculum-based measurement .” Teachers were to give individual students brief assessments—like measuring the number of words read aloud from a text in a minute—perhaps every week or month. The results would indicate a student’s overall academic progress, and the collective data could show whether an instructional approach was working. Despite the name, curriculum-based measurement isn’t tied to any particular curriculum.

Is there a standard RTI curriculum?

And there’s no standard RTI curriculum. Some Tier 2 and 3 students might just have gotten more of the same approach that wasn’t working for them in Tier 1.

How does engaging time affect learning?

As noted above, increasing engaged time has a positive impact on student learn-ing. However, it is when students are both engaged and successful that they learn the most. Merely engaging in a task or performing a skill is not useful if the percentage of errors is too high; in essence, students are spending their time practicing errors. Although student errors or incorrect responses are most likely to occur during initial instruction, you can make learning more efficient for students by minimiz-ing and correcting these errors as soon as they occur. High success rates are posi-tively correlated with increased learning outcomes; conversely, low rates of suc-

What is explicit instruction?

the quest to maximize students’ academic growth, one of the best tools avail-able to educators is explicit instruction, a structured, systematic, and effective methodology for teaching academic skills. It is called explicit because it is an unambiguous and direct approach to teaching that includes both instructional design and delivery procedures. Explicit instruction is characterized by a series of supports or scaffolds, whereby students are guided through the learning process with clear statements about the purpose and rationale for learning the new skill, clear explanations and demonstrations of the instructional target, and supported practice with feedback until independent mastery has been achieved. Rosenshine (1987) described this form of instruction as “a systematic method of teaching with emphasis on proceeding in small steps, checking for student understanding, and achieving active and successful participation by all students” (p. 34).