what does atticus tell scout about why the jury took so long to convict tom

Also question is, why did the jury take a convict Tom? Atticus tells Scout and Jem that the jury took longer than he expected to come to a verdict because "there was one fellow who took considerable wearing down - in the beginning he was rarin' for an outright acquittal". To the children's surprise, that fellow was a relation of the Cunninghams

.

Full Answer

What does Atticus say about why the jury takes so long?

What does Atticus tell Scout about why the jury took so long to convict Tom? Atticus is actually talking to Jem about the length of time it took the jury to make a decision. Atticus said that normally, the jury would only have taken a few minutes to bring back a guilty verdict.

What does Atticus tell scout about the Cunninghams?

Atticus tells Scout that a Cunningham was on the jury and didn't want to convict Tom. This Cunningham thought that Tom was innocent. The jury actually had to think about the conviction before they did it. Why does Aunt Alexandra accept that the Cunninghams may be good but are not "our kind of folks"?

Why did the jury take so long to convict Tom?

What does Atticus tell Scout about why the jury took so long to convict Tom in To Kill a Mockingbird? Atticus explains that the jury took two hours to convict Tom in chapter 23 of To Kill a Mockingbird because there was one juror who refused to vote along with the others.

What piece of information does Atticus reveal that surprises the children?

Atticus then reveals another piece of information that surprises the children. One of the jurors "took considerable wearing down-in the beginning he was rarin’ for an outright acquittal." What is shocking is who the lone holdout on the jury was--a Cunningham.

What did Atticus reveal about the jury in Tom's case?

In the courtroom: Jem simply can't understand how the jury could convict Tom, and Atticus shocks him with the revelation that "'when it's a white man's word against a black man's, the white man always wins. '" Atticus further reveals the jury's mindset when he explains why Tom wasn't at least given a lighter sentence.

Why does it take the jury so long to reach a verdict in TKAM?

Atticus reveals that the jury took so long because there was at least one juror who took a long time to agree with the guilty verdict passed by the others; in fact, Atticus discloses that to begin with this man 'was raring for an outright acquittal' (chapter 23).

How does Atticus explain the jury's decision?

Atticus says that once the higher court reviews his case, Tom has a good chance of going free or at least receiving a new trial. According to Atticus, what is optimistic about Tom's case? If he is found guilty on appeal, Tom will be sentenced to death.

How does Scout know that the jury has convicted Tom?

How does Scout "know" the verdict before she hears it? Scout notices that none of the jury members look at Tom, which indicates that they found him guilty. Why do people in the balcony gallery stand when Atticus leaves the courtroom? They stand out of respect for what Atticus has done for Tom and for their community.

What is unusual about how long it takes the jury?

What is unusual about how long it takes the jury to reach a verdict? Is the verdict predictable or not? The jury was out talking for slightly longer than usual to make up their minds. The verdict is predictable to the reader because the topic of discrimination was clear.

How long was the jury out and why is that important?

They were out thirty minutes and this matters because it shows that the verdict wasn't an immediate decision. How does Bob Ewell react to the verdict? He verbally and physically harms everyone associated with the defending side of the jury.

What are Atticus final words to the jury?

“Gentlemen,” he was saying “I shall be brief, but I would like to use my remaining time with you to remind you that this case is not a difficult one, it requires no minute sifting of complicated facts, but it does require you to be sure beyond a reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant.

What is Atticus's closing argument to the jury?

Atticus Finch concludes his defense of Tom Robinson by asking the jury to set aside racial prejudice and consider what likely occurred between Tom and Mayella Ewell. Mayella has violated a societal norm by kissing a black man, and she is lying to hide the truth, Atticus says.

What were Atticus closing remarks to the jury?

What were Atticus' closing remarks to the jury? He said to put all of their biases aside and judge the case fairly, so that their ruling might be fair and true.

How does Atticus react the the jury's verdict?

When he takes the case, Atticus assumes that they will lose the trial, but he believes they have an excellent chance in the appeal process. The people of his community trust him to do the right thing, and he does. After the trial is over, Atticus feels discouraged by the outcome, but he is not beaten by it.

When the jury comes in what does Scout notice about the jurors behavior?

When the jury comes in, what does Scout notice about the jurors' behavior? According to her, what does their behavior signify? not one of them looked at Tom Robinson." This signifies to Scout that the jury has found Tom Robinson guilty.

How does Scout know the jury's verdict before the judge reads it?

How does Scout know the deliberation before she hears it? Scout had a feeling that the verdict was going to be guilty. She could feel the mood in the courtroom. She also notices that the juries did not look at Tom as they entered.

What chapter does Bob Ewell threaten Atticus?

Bob Ewell threatens Atticus in Chapter 23. He says he is going to get even with Atticus. Atticus in not worried. Atticus thinks that Mr. Ewell is "all talk" and won't really attack him or harm his family.

What is the circumstantial evidence in Tom's case?

In Tom's case, the circumstantial evidence is just his location and race (color). The circumstatntial evidence is that he was at the Ewell's house and that he is black. Atticus tries to overcome the circumstantial evidence by explaining that the bruises could not have been made by him, as he has no use of that one arm.