Universals | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a scholarly online encyclopedia, dealing with philosophy, philosophical topics, and philosophers. The IEP combines open access publication with peer reviewed publication of original papers. Contribution is generally by invitation, and contri…
Full Answer
What is universalism explain with example?
Universal values in different branches of the social sciences
- Philosophy. The philosophical study of universal values seeks to answer certain questions, such as the importance and meaning of what is a universal value and the veracity of its existence ...
- Sociology. In sociology, the study of values seeks to understand how these are formed within a functional society.
- Psychology. ...
What does universalism mean in ethics?
What does universalism mean in ethics? proximation, ethical universalism may be defined as the. doctrine that all persons ought to be treated with equal and impartial. positive consideration for their respective goods or interests.
Do philosophers truly live by their philosophy?
These are the questions that give birth to philosophy as the most uniquely human activity, our distinctive contribution to the dance of nature. Professional philosophers who regard their work with any less earnestness do not deserve to be called ‘professionals’—or ‘philosophers,’ for that matter. They’re just players.
What do Universalists believe?
Universalism (pronounced yu-ni-VER-sul-iz-um) is a doctrine that teaches all people will be saved. Other names for this doctrine are universal restoration, universal reconciliation, universal restitution, and universal salvation. The main argument for universalism is that a good and loving God would not condemn people to eternal torment in hell. Some universalists believe that after a certain cleansing period, God will free the inhabitants of hell and reconcile them to himself.
What does universals mean in philosophy?
Universals are a class of mind-independent entities, usually contrasted with individuals (or so-called “particulars”), postulated to ground and explain relations of qualitative identity and resemblance among individuals. Individuals are said to be similar in virtue of sharing universals.
What are universals in philosophy examples?
For example, the type dog (or doghood) is a universal, as are the property red (or redness) and the relation betweenness (or being between). Any particular dog, red thing, or object that is between other things is not a universal, however, but is an instance of a universal.
What is Plato's theory of universals?
Platonic realism is the philosophical position that universals or abstract objects exist objectively and outside of human minds. It is named after the Greek philosopher Plato who applied realism to such universals, which he considered ideal forms.
What are universals according to Aristotle?
In Aristotle's view, universals are incorporeal and universal, but only exist only where they are instantiated; they exist only in things. Aristotle said that a universal is identical in each of its instances. All red things are similar in that there is the same universal, redness, in each thing.
Did Socrates believe universals?
Second, as distinguished from Plato, Socrates did not separate universals from their particular instantiations. For Plato, the noetic object, the knowable thing, is the separate universal, not the particular. Socrates simply asked the “what is it” question (on this and the previous two points, see Metaphysics I.
What is the problem of universals in philosophy?
The problem of universals is an ancient question from metaphysics that has inspired a range of philosophical topics and disputes: Should the properties an object has in common with other objects, such as color and shape, be considered to exist beyond those objects?
What was Plato's main philosophy?
In metaphysics Plato envisioned a systematic, rational treatment of the forms and their interrelations, starting with the most fundamental among them (the Good, or the One); in ethics and moral psychology he developed the view that the good life requires not just a certain kind of knowledge (as Socrates had suggested) ...
What makes something universal?
The uni in universal means "one" so this word is all about "one for all and all for one." If it's universal, it applies to all cases. Like the universe itself, a universal emotion is one that every human can understand or relate to. The desire for your children to be safe and happy is universal.
What is universal term in logic?
universal, in philosophy, an entity used in a certain type of metaphysical explanation of what it is for things to share a feature, attribute, or quality or to fall under the same type or natural kind. A pair of things resembling each other in any of these ways may be said to have (or to “exemplify”) a common property.
What are Aristotle's arguments on universals and particulars?
Aristotle refutes this separation of universals from particulars in two simple ways: first, he argues that Forms cannot constitute a substance; and, secondly, that since Forms are not substances, Forms cannot cause a substance's coming into being.
What does universality mean in ethics?
Universality in ethics. When used in the context of ethics, the meaning of universal refers to that which is true for "all similarly situated individuals.". Rights, for example in natural rights, or in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, for those heavily influenced by the philosophy of the Enlightenment ...
What is universal truth?
A truth is considered to be universal if it is logically valid in and also beyond all times and places. Hence a universal truth is considered logically to transcend the state of the physical universe, whose order is derived from such truths. In this case, such a truth is seen as eternal or as absolute. The patterns and relations expressed by mathematics in ways that are consistent with the fields of logic and mathematics are typically considered truths of universal scope. This is not to say that universality is limited to mathematics, since it is also used in philosophy, theology, and other pursuits.
Is a truth universal?
Some philosophers have referred to such propositions as universalizable. A truth is considered to be universal if it is logically valid in and also beyond all times and places. Hence a universal truth is considered logically to transcend the state of the physical universe, whose order is derived from such truths.
Is universality limited to mathematics?
This is not to say that universality is limited to mathematics, since it is also used in philosophy, theology, and other pursuits. The relativist conception of truth denies the existence of some or all universal truths, particularly ethical ones (as moral relativism ).
What are universals in metaphysics?
In metaphysics, the term ‘universals’ is applied to things of two sorts: properties ( such as redness or roundness), and relations (such as kinship relations like sisterhood, or the causal relation, or spatial and temporal relations). Universals are to be understood by contrast with particulars. Few universals, if any, are truly ‘universal’ in the sense that they are shared by all individuals – a universal is characteristically the sort of thing which some individuals may have in common, and others may lack.
What is universal in science?
Few universals, if any, are truly ‘universal’ in the sense that they are shared by all individuals – a universal is characteristically the sort of thing which some individuals may have in common, and others may lack.
What are the cognates of universals?
Other terms cognate with universals include not only properties and relations, but also qualities, attributes, characteristics, essences and accidents (in the sense of qualities which a thing has not of necessity but only by accident), species and genus, and natural kinds.
Which two traditions have dealt with universals?
Many traditions, East and West, have dealt with the underlying problem which generates theories of universals; nevertheless the term ‘universals’ is closely tied to the Western tradition, and the agenda has been set largely by the work of Plato and Aristotle.
Is Plato a universalist?
The term often used in connection with Plato is not ‘universals’ but ‘Forms’ (or ‘Ideas’, used in the sense of ideals rather than of thoughts), the term ‘universals’ echoing Aristotle more than Plato.
What is the term for the philosophical view of realism?
The term “ Platonism ” has often been used, especially in the philosophy of mathematics, as an alternative to the correspondingly wider use of “realism” to denote ontological views to which such nominalism stands opposed.
What is Plato's theory of form?
One of the earliest and most famous realist doctrines is Plato ’s theory of Forms, which asserts that things such as “the Beautiful” (or “Beauty”) and “the Just” (or “Justice”) exist over and above the particular beautiful objects and just acts in which they are instantiated and more or less imperfectly exemplified; the Forms themselves are thought of as located neither in space nor in time. Although Plato’s usual term for them ( eido) is often translated in English as Idea, it is clear that he did not think of them as mental but rather as abstract, existing independently both of mental activity and of sensible particulars. As such, they lie beyond the reach of sense perception, which Plato regarded as providing only beliefs about appearances as opposed to knowledge of what is truly real. Indeed, the Forms are knowable only by the philosophically schooled intellect.
What does universal mean in philosophy?
Universal, in philosophy, an entity used in a certain type of metaphysical explanation of what it is for things to share a feature, attribute, or quality or to fall under the same type or natural kind. A pair of things resembling each other in any of these ways may be said to have (or to “exemplify”) a common property.
Why are some philosophers considered Platonic?
Nevertheless, many modern and contemporary philosophers, including Gottlob Frege, the early Bertrand Russell, Alonzo Church, and George Bealer are properly called “Platonic” realists because they believed in universals that are abstract or transcendent and that do not depend upon the existence of their instances.
What are realists opposed to?
Realists are still opposed by nominalists , and realists themselves are still sharply divided between those who adhere to something like Plato ’s conception of universals and those who favour Aristotle ’s. Realists also remain divided between those who posit a plenitude of universals and those who accept very few.
What was the central theme of medieval Western philosophy?
The problem of universals was arguably the central theme of medieval Western philosophy. Just before the medieval period, St. Augustine defended a version of Platonism, identifying Platonic forms with exemplars timelessly existing in the mind of God. Although many medieval philosophers were Aristotelian realists of one sort or another, a few developed varieties of nominalism. William of Ockham, for example, claimed that things “share features in common” in virtue of the fact that objective relations of resemblance hold among them. But he denied that the holding of such relations requires that there be anything literally the same within the things themselves. Ockham explained the human ability to think and talk in general terms by appealing to mental entities, or concepts, which serve as “natural signs” of the many things to which they apply.
How did Ockham explain the human ability to think and talk in general terms?
Ockham explained the human ability to think and talk in general terms by appealing to mental entities, or concepts, which serve as “natural signs” of the many things to which they apply.
What is Plato's form?
Plato’s forms are abstract or transcendent, occupying a realm completely outside space and time. They cannot affect or be affected by any object or event in the physical universe.
Is Universals immanent?
Universals are also immanent according to defenders of the so-called “ bundle ” theory—philosophers such as David Hume and the later Russell, who said that individuals are just bundles of universals. An individual stop sign, for example, consists of the universals eight-sidedness, redness, hardness, and so on.
What is the problem of universals?
“The problem of universals” in general is a historically variable bundle of several closely related, yet in different conceptual frameworks rather differently articulated metaphysical, logical, and epistemological questions, ultimately all connected to the issue of how universal cognition of singular things is possible. How do we know, for example, that the Pythagorean theorem holds universally, for all possible right triangles? Indeed, how can we have any awareness of a potential infinity of all possible right triangles, given that we could only see a finite number of actual ones? How can we universally indicate all possible right triangles with the phrase ‘right triangle’? Is there something common to them all signified by this phrase? If so, what is it, and how is it related to the particular right triangles? The medieval problem of universals is a logical, and historical, continuation of the ancient problem generated by Plato’s (428–348 B.C.) theory answering such a bundle of questions, namely, his theory of Ideas or Forms.
What is universalia in re?
The universal features of singular things, inherent in these things themselves, were referred to as universalia in re (‘universals in the thing’), answering the universal exemplars in the divine mind, the universalia ante rem (‘universals before the thing’). [ 4] .
What were Plato's problems with his theory?
The inherent problems with Plato’s original theory were recognized already by Plato himself. In his Parmenides Plato famously raised a number of difficulties, for which he apparently did not provide satisfactory answers. Aristotle (384–322 B.C.), with all due reverence to his teacher, consistently rejected Plato’s theory, and heavily criticized it throughout his own work. (Hence the famous saying, amicus Plato sed magis amica veritas ). [ 1] Nevertheless, despite this explicit doctrinal conflict, Neo-Platonic philosophers, pagans (such as Plotinus ca. 204–270, and Porphyry, ca. 234–305) and Christians (such as Augustine, 354–430, and Boethius, ca. 480–524) alike, observed a basic concordance between Plato’s and Aristotle’s approach, crediting Aristotle with an explanation of how the human mind acquires its universal concepts of particular things from experience, and Plato with providing an explanation of how the universal features of particular things are established by being modeled after their universal archetypes. [ 2] In any case, it was this general attitude toward the problem in late antiquity that set the stage for the ever more sophisticated medieval discussions. [ 3] In these discussions, the concepts of the human mind, therefore, were regarded as posterior to the particular things represented by these concepts, and hence they were referred to as universalia post rem (‘universals after the thing’). The universal features of singular things, inherent in these things themselves, were referred to as universalia in re (‘universals in the thing’), answering the universal exemplars in the divine mind, the universalia ante rem (‘universals before the thing’). [ 4] All these, universal concepts, universal features of singular things, and their exemplars, are expressed and signified by means of some obviously universal signs, the universal (or common) terms of human languages. For example, the term ‘man’, in English is a universal term, because it is truly predicable of all men in one and the same sense, as opposed to the singular term ‘Socrates’, which in the same sense, i.e., when not used equivocally, is only predicable of one man (hence the need to add an ordinal number to the names of kings and popes of the same name).
What is the importance of the Neo-Platonic theological side of the issue?
Augustine, was for medieval thinkers the theory of ontologically primary universals as the creative archetypes of the divine mind, the Divine Ideas.
Who first dealt with the problem of universals?
It was Abelard who first dealt with the problem of universals explicitly in this form. Having relatively easily disposed of putative universal forms as real entities corresponding to Boethius’ definition, in his Logica Ingredientibus he concludes that given Aristotle’s definition of universals in his On Interpretation as those things that can be predicated of several things, it is only universal words that can be regarded as really existing universals. However, since according to Aristotle’s account in the same work, words are meaningful in virtue of signifying concepts in the mind, Abelard soon arrives at the following questions:
Is a universal triangle a square?
However, obviously nothing can have these properties at the same time, so nothing can be a universal triangle any more than a round square.
Is the form a universal entity?
So, the Form itself is a universal entity, a universal model of all its particulars; and since it is the knowledge of this universal entity that can enable us to know at once all its particulars, it is absolutely vital for us to know what it is, what it is like, and exactly how it is related to its particulars.
What is universal metaphysics?
In metaphysics, a universal is what particular things have in common, namely characteristics or qualities. In other words, universals are repeatable or recurrent entities that can be instantiated or exemplified by many particular things. For example, suppose there are two chairs in a room, each of which is green.
What is the problem of universals?
The problem arises from attempts to account for the phenomenon of similarity or attribute agreement among things. For example, grass and Granny Smith apples are similar or agree in attribute, namely in having the attribute of greenness. The issue is how to account for this sort of agreement in attribute among things.
What is the first thing a chair must exist upon?
A chair must first exist upon a surface with the force of gravity upon it. The chair must be upon something solid and it must provide a platform for something to sit upon. Any other universals for “chairness” must qualify the particular dependencies set forth by authority.
Who said universals are multiply-exemplifiable?
In other discussions, Plato describes particulars as "participating" in the associated universal. Contemporary realists agree with the thesis that universals are multiply-exemplifiable entities. Examples include by D. M. Armstrong, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Reinhardt Grossmann, Michael Loux.
Is universal abstract or concrete?
However, universals are not necessarily abstract and particulars are not necessarily concrete. For example, one might hold that numbers are particular yet abstract objects. Likewise, some philosophers, such as D. M. Armstrong, consider universals to be concrete.
Is a dog a universal?
A universal may have instances, known as its particulars. For example, the type dog (or doghood) is a universal, as are the property red (or redness) and the relation betweenness (or being between ). Any particular dog, red thing, or object that is between other things is not a universal, however, but is an instance of a universal. That is, a universal type ( doghood ), property ( redness ), or relation ( betweenness) inheres in a particular object (a specific dog, red thing, or object between other things).
Do nominalists believe in universals?
Nominalists deny that universals exist, claiming that they are not necessary to explain attribute agreement. Conceptualists posit that universals exist only in the mind, or when conceptualized, denying the independent existence of universals, but accepting they have a fundamentum in re.
Introduction
- An inventory of reality’s most fundamental entities would almost certainly include individuals. Individuals are singular objects. They can exist over time, but in only one place at a time. Individuals also have properties (also called qualities), at least most of which can vary over time…
Versions of Realism
- We’ll begin by examining versions of Realism, all of which claim that yes, there are universals; yes, there are truths about the general; yes, there is commonality in nature. Unless we accept universals into our world view, the Realist argues, we will be unable to explain a fundamental and apparent fact, namely, that there is genuine commonality and systematicity in nature. Again, exp…
Concluding Thoughts
- As with many issues in philosophy, we started with a fairly simple question and found it difficult to reach a satisfactory answer. Qualitative similarity is a seemingly undeniable feature of our experience of the world. And there seems to be every reason to expect an explanation for this common fact. But upon closer inspection we find that we must either accept some rather unusu…
References and Further Reading
- Armstrong, D.M. Universals: An Opinionated Introduction (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989).
- Armstrong, D.M. What is a Law of Nature? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
- Campbell, K. Abstract Particulars (Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd., 1990).
- Loux, M. Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction (London: Routledge, 1998).
Overview
In philosophy, universality or absolutism is the idea that universal facts exist and can be progressively discovered, as opposed to relativism, which asserts that all facts are merely relative to one's perspective. Absolutism and relativism have been explored at length in contemporary analytic philosophy.
Also see Kantian and Platonist notions of "universal", which are considered by most philosophers t…
Universals in metaphysics
In metaphysics, a universal is a proposed type, property, or relation which can be instantiated by many different particulars. While universals are related to the concept of universality, the concept is importantly distinct; see the main page on universals for a full treatment of the topic.
Universality in ethics
When used in the context of ethics, the meaning of universal refers to that which is true for "all similarly situated individuals". Rights, for example in natural rights, or in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, for those heavily influenced by the philosophy of the Enlightenment and its conception of a human nature, could be considered universal. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights is inspired by such principles.
Universality about truth
In logic, or the consideration of valid arguments, a proposition is said to have universality if it can be conceived as being true in all possible contexts without creating a contradiction. Some philosophers have referred to such propositions as universalizable. A truth is considered to be universal if it is logically valid in and also beyond all times and places. Hence a universal truth is considered logically to transcend the state of the physical universe, whose order is derived from …
See also
• Natural law
• Natural and legal rights
• Moral universalism
• Universal law
• Tianxia
External links
• "Unesco website : philosophy and ethics" (PDF).