What are the kinds of vincible ignorance?
- invincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a person has no way to obtain.
- vincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a rational person is capable of acquiring by making an effort.
- nescience: lack of knowledge that doesn't matter in the circumstances (from Latin ne-, “not” plus scire, “to know.”
- invincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a person has no way to obtain.
- vincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a rational person is capable of acquiring by making an effort.
- nescience: lack of knowledge that doesn't matter in the circumstances (from Latin ne-, “not” plus scire, “to know.”
What is vincible ignorance?
Not to be confused with Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology). Vincible ignorance is, in Catholic moral theology, ignorance that a person could remove by applying reasonable diligence in the given set of circumstances.
What are the different types of ignorance?
Types of Ignorance. vincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a rational person is capable of acquiring by making an effort nescience: lack of knowledge that doesn’t matter in the circumstances (from Latin ne -, “not” plus scire, “to know.” In Catholic theology, invincible ignorance, “whether of the law or the fact,...
Is it possible for a person to be invincibly ignorant?
However, no one is presumed to be ignorant of the principles of moral law since these are written on the heart of every man (CCC 1860). It is possible for a person to be invincibly ignorant that an act is required by natural law.
Is there a difference between being vincible and Invincible?
In practical use, the terms vincible and invincible may pose problems for those unfamiliar with Catholic moral terminology. For many, vincible is a wholly unfamiliar term and invincible can suggest that which can never be overcome, no matter how much diligence is shown.
What are the 4 types of ignorance?
Ignorance can appear in three different types: factual ignorance (absence of knowledge of some fact), object ignorance (unacquaintance with some object), and technical ignorance (absence of knowledge of how to do something).
What is vincible ignorance in ethics?
Vincible ignorance is, in Catholic moral theology, ignorance that a person could remove by applying reasonable diligence in the given set of circumstances.
What are the 2 kinds of ignorance?
The first category of ignorance is when we do not know we are ignorant. This is primary ignorance. The second category of ignorance is when we recognize our ignorance.
What's the difference between Vincible and invincible ignorance?
Invincible ignorance is doing something wrong when one could not have known better; vincible ignorance is doing wrong when one ought to have known better.
Which type of vincible ignorance increases voluntariness?
Vincible ignorance lessens the voluntariness of an act. Affected ignorance, in one way lessens, and in another way increases voluntariness. Antecedent concupiscence lessens the voluntariness of an act. Antecedent concupiscence does not destroy the voluntariness of an act.
How do the kinds of ignorance affect responsibility?
Abstract. Some philosophers contend that concomitant ignorance preserves moral responsibility for wrongdoing. An agent is concomitantly ignorant with respect to wrongdoing if and only if her ignorance is non-culpable, but she would freely have performed the same action if she were not ignorant.
What are some examples of ignorance?
The belief that red makes a bull mad is an example of ignorance. Another example of ignorance is thinking that eating an hour before swimming causes cramps. Thomas Edison did not invent the light bulb, although many are ignorant of that fact. He did invent a practical and longer lasting light bulb.
What is antecedent ignorance?
Antecedent ignorance excludes all exercise of the will, because no knowledge is had of the object; consequent ignorance is willed implicitly, and hence does not entirely exclude knowledge; and the same is to be said of concomitant ignorance.
What is Socratic ignorance?
Updated on February 07, 2019. Socratic ignorance refers, paradoxically, to a kind of knowledge–a person's frank acknowledgment of what they don't know. It is captured by the well-known statement: “I know only one thing–that I know nothing.” Paradoxically, Socratic ignorance is also referred to as "Socratic wisdom."
Which of the following is an example of invincible ignorance *?
Examples: "Capital punishment is just wrong, no matter what you say." "The earth is flat. The evidence for a round earth, such as the so-called landing on the Moon, was faked.
What is Vincible erroneous conscience?
Vincible ignorance, however, is when a person is aware that what they are doing is wrong and they are given moral responsibility. Aquinas would say that this case of erroneous consciousness isn't excusable because the person is aware of what they are.
What are the types of conscience?
Certain conscience means convinced without any doubt that an action is good or bad....Assistant ProfessorCorrect conscience.Erroneous conscience.Certain conscience.Doubtful conscience.Lax conscience.Scrupulous conscience.Delicate conscience.
What is vincible ignorance?
Not to be confused with Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology). Vincible ignorance is, in Catholic moral theology, ignorance that a person could remove by applying reasonable diligence in the given set of circumstances. It contrasts with invincible ignorance, which a person is either entirely incapable of removing, ...
What is it called when ignorance is crass or supine?
If some insufficient diligence was shown in dispelling ignorance, it is termed merely vincible; it may diminish culpability to the point of rendering a sin venial. When little or no effort is made to remove ignorance, the ignorance is termed crass or supine; it removes little or no guilt.
What does it mean to be deliberately fostered?
Deliberately fostered ignorance is affected or studied; it can increase guilt. Of law, when one is unaware of the existence of the law itself, or at least that a particular case is comprised under its provisions. Of fact, when not the relation of something to the law but the thing itself or some circumstance is unknown.
Is it culpable to remain ignorant?
It is culpable to remain willfully ignorant of matters that one is obligated to know. While invincible ignorance eliminates culpability, vincible ignorance at most mitigates it, and may even aggravate guilt.
What happens if a vincibly ignorant person shows reasonable diligence?
If a vincibly ignorant person showed almost reasonable diligence, most of his imputability for the sin could be removed. If he was crassly ignorant, having shown little or no diligence compared to what was reasonable, little or none of his imputability would be removed.
What is the difference between ignorance and nescience?
Ignorance is distinguished from mere nescience, which is a lack of knowledge that a person has no need of. For example, a person who did not know the square root of 1429 would be ignorant of it if he were taking a test that required him to know the answer, but he would be nescient of it if performing a task that didn’t require the number. ...
What is the difference between "vincible" and "invincible"?
For many, vincible is a wholly unfamiliar term and invincible can suggest that which can never be overcome, no matter how much diligence is shown.
What is the meaning of ignorance in moral theology?
Ignorance—Invincible and Vincible. In moral theology, ignorance is defined as a lack of knowledge that a person ought to have. Ignorance is distinguished from mere nescience, which is a lack of knowledge that a person has no need of. For example, a person who did not know the square root of 1429 would be ignorant of it if he were taking a test ...
What is reasonable diligence?
Reasonable diligence, in turn, is that diligence that a conscientious person would display in seeking the correct answer to a question given (a) the gravity of the question and (b) his particular resources. The gravity of a question is determined by how great a need the person has to know the answer. The answers to fundamental questions (how ...
Can ignorance diminish imputability?
Potentially, ignorance can diminish or remove imputability for any kind of sin. However, no one is presumed to be ignorant of the principles of moral law since these are written on the heart of every man (CCC 1860). It is possible for a person to be invincibly ignorant that an act is required by natural law.
Does ignorance increase culpability?
Affected or studied ignorance can increase culpability for a sin, especially if it displays hardness of heart, whereby one would commit the sin irrespective of any law that might exist concerning it. Such an attitude shows contempt for moral law and so increases culpability (cf. CCC 1859).
What does invincible ignorance mean?
Invincible ignorance removes one's culpability for a materially sinful act, whether one of omission or commission (CCC 1793). Vincible ignorance may variously affect one's culpability for a sinful act, depending on the kind of vincibility. If some, but insufficient, diligence was shown toward finding the answer, ...
What happens if a vincibly ignorant person shows reasonable diligence?
If a vincibly ignorant person showed almost reasonable diligence, most of his imputability for the sin could be removed. If he was crassly ignorant, having shown little or no diligence compared to what was reasonable, little or none of his imputability would be removed.
What does James Akin mean by "vincible ignorance"?
In this article, James Akin explains the meaning of vincible and invincible ignorance in the light of moral theology. He also differentiates among the degrees of vincible ignorance and the consequent culpability of the individual. Akin discusses these varying degrees of ignorance in the context of salvation, and demonstrates the importance ...
What is the difference between ignorance and nescience?
Ignorance is distinguished from mere nescience, which is a lack of knowledge that a person has no need of. For example, a person who did not know the square root of 1429 would be ignorant of it if he were taking a math test, but he would be nescient of it if performing a task that didn't require the number.
What does it mean when you are ignorant of the requirement of baptism?
If one is invincibly ignorant of the requirement of baptism but would seek baptism if one knew it was required, then the lack of baptism will not be held against one. This is expressly taught by the Church (CCC 1260). One would thus be recognized as having baptism of desire, at least implicitly.
What is reasonable diligence?
Reasonable diligence, in turn, is that diligence that a conscientious person would display in seeking the correct answer to a question given (a) the gravity of the question and (b) his particular resources. The gravity of a question is determined by how great a need the person has to know the answer. The answers to fundamental questions (how ...
Does vincible ignorance increase culpability?
Invincible ignorance removes culpability for the sins against faith, merely vincible ignorance diminishes culpability (sometimes to the point of being venial), crass or supine ignorance will affect culpability for them little or not at all, and hard hearted, affected ignorance will increase culpability for them.
What does "invincible ignorance" mean?
For logicians, the term “invincible ignorance” means “the fallacy of insisting on the legitimacy of one’s position in the face of contradictory facts.”. If the facts are presented, there’s no excuse to refuse to acknowledge them.
What does "ignorance" mean?
ignorance: n. lack of knowledge. Everyone is born ignorant into the world. The word ignorance is from Latin ignorantia. The prefix in – means “not”; Old Latin gnarus means “aware, acquainted with.”. Mere ignorance is nothing to be ashamed of. Ignorant is not a synonym for “stupid.”.
Is "ignorant" a synonym for "stupid"?
Ignorant is not a synonym for “stupid.”. invincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a person has no way to obtain. vincible ignorance: lack of knowledge that a rational person is capable of acquiring by making an effort.
