how did the 35 compromise resolve this conflict

What was the Great Compromise in the declaration of Independence?

In its early years, following the American Revolution, the United States went through quite a bit of struggle and debate as it tried to get a suitable government established. The Great Compromise came about as an effort to resolve one of these struggles. Become a Study.com member to unlock this answer! Create your account

What is a compromise?

A compromise is a settlement of differences, an agreement reached by adjusting conflicting or opposing viewpoints or positions through a reciprocal modification of needs and requests. It’s essentially a meeting in the middle.

Is compromise a sign of weakness?

Compromise is not a sign of weakness or giving in. Rather, it demonstrates emotional intelligence, integrity, and character. Compromise helps both sides to find a “win-win” and you may even come up with creative solutions that neither of you had considered before.

What is the next step in the conflict resolution process?

The next step is to discover the position of each of the parties involved in the conflict (the problem) and to ensure that both parties are able to make a decision. Meaning, make sure you’re negotiating with the right person.

What did the 35 compromise do?

Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

What did the Great Compromise resolve a conflict over?

Connecticut Compromise, also known as Great Compromise, in United States history, the compromise offered by Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth during the drafting of the Constitution of the United States at the 1787 convention to solve the dispute between small and large states over representation ...

What conflict was resolved by the three fifths compromise?

Before the Civil War By including three-fifths of slaves (who had no voting rights) in the legislative apportionment, the Three-fifths Compromise provided additional representation in the House of Representatives of slave states compared to the free states.

How did compromises resolve conflicts at the Constitutional Convention?

Large states favored representation by population, while small states argued for equal representation by State. The "Great Compromise" allowed for both by establishing the House of Representatives, which was apportioned by populations, and the Senate which represented the states equally.

What problem does the Great Compromise solve and how does it solve this problem?

The Great Compromise settled matters of representation in the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise settled matters of representation when it came to the enslaved population of southern states and the importation of enslaved Africans. The Electoral College settled how the president would be elected.

How did the Great Compromise resolve the conflict between the Virginia and New Jersey plans?

How did the Great Compromise resolve the differences between the Virginia and New Jersey plans? The Senate would have two senators for each state; the House of Representatives would be based on the state's population.

How did the Three-Fifths Compromise work quizlet?

It said that slaves could be counted as 3/5 of a person for both representation and taxation. Also said that international slave trade would not cease (stop) for two decades (until 1808). The federal government was to assist in the return of runaway slaves ("fugitive laborers") throughout the country.

How did the 3/5ths compromise lead to the Civil War?

Southern states used their political power (earned via the three-fifths compromise) to ensure that the US had an equal number of slaveholding and non-slaveholding states for years. Slavery was the biggest issue that drove the Civil War, but the growing tension over the issue was a driving force behind armed conflict.

What compromise made it possible for agree to give up their power to make war?

The Missouri Compromise, as it was known, would remain in force for just over 30 years before it was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. In 1857, the Supreme Court ruled the compromise unconstitutional in the Dred Scott case, setting the stage for the nation's final path toward the Civil War.

What were the compromises of the Civil War?

The main points of the compromise were that California would be admitted as a free state (which would balance the admission of Texas as a slave state), the territories of Utah and New Mexico would be admitted as slave or free states based on popular vote rather than by whether they were north or south of the Missouri ...

How did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention resolve their disagreement regarding slavery?

How did the delegates to the Constitutional Convention resolve their disagreement regarding slavery? It was agreed that Congress would abolish slavery in 1850. It was agreed that a state's slave population would be counted for purposes of representation but not for purposes of taxation.

What issue was resolved with the Great Compromise between the Federalists and Anti Federalists?

The Great Compromise of 1787 between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists resolved the issue of legislative power.

What was the 3/5 compromise?

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement , made at the 1787 Constitutional Convention, that allowed Southern states to count a portion of its enslaved population for purposes of taxation and representation.

How did the Three Fifths compromise affect politics?

How the Compromise Affected Politics in the 19th Century. The three-fifth s compromise had a major impact on U.S. politics for decades to come. It allowed pro-slavery states to have a disproportionate influence on the presidency, the Supreme Court, and other positions of power. It also resulted in the country having a roughly equal number ...

What was the effect of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854?

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed residents to determine for themselves whether they wanted to allow the enslavement of Black people in their territories. Altogether, the three-fifths compromise had a detrimental impact on vulnerable populations, such as the enslaved and the nation’s Indigenous peoples.

What did the Dixiecrats do to make the South more equitable?

The Dixiecrats used the power they had in Congress to block attempts to make the South a more equitable place. Eventually, however, federal legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would thwart their efforts.

What was the effect of the compromise on the Southern states?

This agreement gave the Southern states more electoral power than they would have had if the en slaved population had been ignored entirely.

Why did Congress members from other regions seek to reduce the South's voting power?

Congress members from other regions sought to reduce the South's voting power because Black people were being stripped of their voting rights there , but a 1900 proposal to do so never materialized. Ironically, this is because the South had too much representation in Congress to allow for a switch.

Where did the Three Fifths compromise originate?

Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise. At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, ...

Why did the Great Compromise resolve the issue of representation in the United States legislature?

Large states wanted greater representation because of their larger population, and smaller states wanted all states represented equally. On July 16, 1787, the Great Compromise, also commonly known as the Connecticut Compromise in a nod to Oliver Ellsworth ...

Who created the Great Compromise?

On July 16, 1787, the Great Compromise, also commonly known as the Connecticut Compromise in a nod to Oliver Ellsworth and Roger Sherman, the Connecticut congressional delegates who created the compromise, solved debate that threatened to destroy the whole plan for the Senate and House of Representatives.

Which plan called for each state to have the exact same number of representatives?

Smaller states favored the New Jersey Plan, which called for each state to have the exact same number of representatives. These smaller states thought that the Virginia Plan was unfair and demanded that both houses have completely equal representation for all states.

What was the process of apportionment in the Federalist Papers?

This new structure and the powers of the Congress, along with the Great Compromise, were all explained in James Madison and Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Papers. To fairly determine the number of each state's representatives going to the House, the government underwent a process known as apportionment, which was the first census.

Why was the Three Fifths Compromise reached?

The Three-fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention due to disputes over how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population. This number would determine a state's number of seats in the House of Representatives and how much it would pay in taxes.

What was the effect of the compromise of counting all other persons as only three-fifths of their actual numbers

After a contentious debate, the compromise that was finally agreed upon—of counting "all other persons" as only three-fifths of their actual numbers—reduced the representation of the slave states relative to the original proposals, but improved it over the Northern position. An inducement for slave states to accept the Compromise was its tie to taxation in the same ratio, so that the burden of taxation on the slave states was also reduced.

Why did the Three Fifths compromise favor the Southern states?

While the Three-fifths Compromise could be seen to favor Southern states because of their large slave populations, for example, the Connecticut Compromise tended to favor the Northern states (which were generally smaller). Support for the new Constitution rested on the balance of these sectional interests.

What happened after the Reconstruction Era?

After the Reconstruction Era came to an end in 1877, the former slave states subverted the objective of these changes by using various strategies to disenfranchise their black citizens, while obtaining the benefit of apportionment of representatives on the basis of the total populations.

What was the Constitution before the Civil War?

The Garrisonian view (William Lloyd Garrison, December 10, 1805 – May 24, 1879, a prominent American abolitionist best known for his widely-read anti-slavery newspaper The Liberator of the 1830s) of the Constitution was that it was a pro-slavery document written by racists and only completely dividing the Union could satisfy the cause of anti-slavery. Following a bitter series of public debates including one with George Thompson, Frederick Douglass took another view and pointed to the Constitution as an anti-slavery document, saying the following:

What was the proposed ratio?

The proposed ratio was, however, a ready solution to the impasse that arose during the Constitutional Convention. In that situation, the alignment of the contending forces was the reverse of what had been obtained under the Articles of Confederation in 1783.

How many seats did the slave states have in 1812?

In 1812, slave states had 76 seats out of 143 instead of the 59 they would have had; in 1833, 98 seats out of 240, instead of 73. As a result, Southern states had additional influence on the presidency, the speakership of the House, and the Supreme Court until the American Civil War.

Origins of The Three-Fifths Compromise

The Three-Fifths Compromise in The Constitution

How The Compromise Affected Politics in The 19th Century

Repeal of The Three-Fifths Compromise

• The 13th Amendment of 1865 effectively gutted the three-fifths compromise by outlawing the enslavement of Black people. But when the 14th Amendmentwas ratified in 1868, it officially repealed the three-fifths compromise. Section 2 of the amendment states that seats in the House of Representatives were to be determined based on “the whole number of ...

See more on thoughtco.com

Sources